BTC$69,759+1.11%|
ETH$2,084+1.43%|
XRP$1.49+5.10%|
ADA$0.2933+7.70%|
SOL$87.94+3.10%|
USDT$0.9997+0.01%|
USDC$0.9999-0.00%|
BTC$69,759+1.11%|
ETH$2,084+1.43%|
XRP$1.49+5.10%|
ADA$0.2933+7.70%|
SOL$87.94+3.10%|
USDT$0.9997+0.01%|
USDC$0.9999-0.00%|
BTC$69,759+1.11%|
ETH$2,084+1.43%|
XRP$1.49+5.10%|
ADA$0.2933+7.70%|
SOL$87.94+3.10%|
USDT$0.9997+0.01%|
USDC$0.9999-0.00%|
Crypto Regulation
February 2026
2 min read

The Unseen Driver: How Regulation is Steering Crypto Markets

Analysis of how regulatory forces shape crypto market volatility beyond institutional flows, examining ETF rules, stablecoin regulation, AML enforcement, and tax reporting.

crypto regulation, market volatility, ETF

The Unseen Driver: How Regulation is Steering Crypto Markets

Whilst daily market reports focus on ETF flows and liquidity, a deeper, more powerful force is at play: the unseen hand of regulation. The recent volatility in crypto markets isn't just about institutional flows; it's a direct reflection of the legal and regulatory uncertainty that continues to shape the industry.

⚖️ THE LEGAL LEVERS BEHIND THE VOLATILITY

1. ETF Approval & Custody Rules: The very existence of spot BTC ETFs is a product of regulatory approval. The SEC's interpretation of custody rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940¹ was a critical hurdle. The ongoing debate about whether these ETFs can hold other crypto-assets is a major source of market uncertainty.

2. Stablecoin Regulation (or Lack Thereof): The report highlights thin liquidity and sharp price movements. This is exacerbated by the lack of a clear regulatory framework for stablecoins. The ongoing stalemate over the CLARITY Act² and the GENIUS Act³ means that the very foundation of crypto liquidity remains on shaky legal ground.

3. AML/CFT Enforcement: The report notes deleveraging and liquidations. These are often triggered by enforcement actions from bodies like FinCEN and the FCA. The Travel Rule⁴, now being enforced more strictly, is forcing exchanges to tighten their controls, leading to market friction.

4. Tax Reporting & CARF: The OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF)⁵ is forcing exchanges to become global tax collectors. This creates compliance burdens and can lead to capital flight from jurisdictions with stricter enforcement, impacting liquidity.

❓ THE FOUNDER'S DILEMMA

For founders, this means navigating a market that is driven by forces far beyond their control. It's not enough to build a great product; you must also build a resilient legal and compliance framework that can withstand regulatory shocks.

References

¹ Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Section 206(4)-2 (Custody Rule) ² CLARITY for Digital Assets Act of 2025 ³ Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act (GENIUS Act) ⁴ FATF Recommendation 16 (The Travel Rule) ⁵ OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF)

This article was originally published on LinkedIn.

View on LinkedIn →

Related Topics:

crypto regulationmarket volatilityETFstablecoinsAMLCARFCLARITY ActGENIUS Actcompliance
Gavin Ignatius Persaud

Gavin Ignatius Persaud

Solicitor | Fintech Law Specialist

Gavin is a specialist solicitor with over 25 years of experience in financial technology regulation, digital assets law, and emerging technology compliance. He advises premier financial institutions and innovative technology companies on complex regulatory matters across 33 jurisdictions.

Fintech RegulationCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & Data PrivacyMiCA & DORA Expert

Qualifications: PhD (Cryptocurrency & Stablecoin Policy), LLM (Commercial Law), Solicitor of England & Wales

Experience: £750M+ transaction value | 33 jurisdictions | Trusted adviser to Morgan Stanley, American Express, Visa, Citibank, and leading fintech innovators

Need Expert Guidance on Crypto Regulation?

Get specialist legal advice on fintech regulation, compliance, and emerging technology law.